
John Mayaki’s recent comments on the Edo State Governorship Election Petition have raised serious concerns about the integrity of the judicial process. With reckless disregard for due process, Mayaki has positioned himself as a public adjudicator, making premature and sweeping judgments on a case still under tribunal review. By dismissing the petitioners’ evidence as “worthless” and predicting their failure, Mayaki isn’t just sharing an opinion—he’s undermining the judiciary and the principle of fair hearings.
His remarks, spread across social media, are not only premature but prejudicial, threatening to distort public perception and erode confidence in the impartiality of the tribunal. Legal matters should be decided in the courtroom, not influenced by external commentary.
Mayaki’s actions set a dangerous precedent. By dismissing the petitioners’ evidence with contempt, he disrespects both the tribunal and the legal professionals involved. The judiciary must not be used as a platform for self-promotion or political theatrics. Mayaki’s comments, seemingly motivated by partisan interests, demand clear and strong condemnation.
It is crucial for Justice Wilfred Kpochi, Chairman of the Edo Governorship Election Tribunal, to act swiftly. He must issue a warning to Mayaki and, by extension, the APC, whose interests Mayaki’s comments seem to support. Mayaki must understand that his role is not to preempt the tribunal’s judgment but to respect its process.
The courtroom must remain a place for impartial justice, free from outside interference. Mayaki’s comments undermine democracy and attack the credibility of the judiciary. If unchecked, they could embolden others to treat the judicial process with similar disdain, weakening public trust in this vital institution.
The message is clear: all stakeholders must reject this behavior. Respect for the courts and adherence to due process are essential for a functioning democracy. By holding Mayaki accountable and promoting decorum in public discourse, we protect the rule of law and the integrity of the judiciary.
